Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Axon 11 4G
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Axon 11 4G (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 11 4G leads — 16/100 vs 11/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP.
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 168g vs 179g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (90/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Axon 11 4G, the ZTE Axon 11 4G scores 5 points higher (16/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Axon 11 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | — | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 159.2×73.4×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 168 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (31/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The ZTE Axon 11 4G edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the ZTE Axon 11 4G — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The ZTE Axon 11 4G leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 11 4G is a better fit for everyday use.