Motorola Moto G67 Power vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Moto G67 Power (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $200 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G67 Power has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 798,429); the Motorola Moto G67 Power is noticeably lighter (210g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G67 Power

Performance 53
Display 66
Camera 40
Battery 57
Portability 47
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Moto G67 Power better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
  • Lighter: 210g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $899

  • Better portability (47/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 798429
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2687
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G67 Power vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G67 Power — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G67 Power Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 798429 3326259
Geekbench Single 1015 3293
Geekbench Multi 2687 10243
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 210 g 226 g
Launch price $200 $899

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G67 Power and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G67 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
52/100
798429 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +76.0%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Moto G67 Power by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G67 Power

$200

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $699. Motorola Moto G67 Power was $699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (94/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (84/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (96/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G67 Power has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G67 Power over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.