Motorola Moto G64 vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G64 leads — 32/100 vs 31/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Motorola Moto G64 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is thinner (7.8mm vs 8.9mm).
Motorola Moto G64
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 30W
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Motorola Moto G64 scores 1 points higher (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Moto G64 edges out the Vivo Y300 (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Moto G64 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.