Motorola Defy 2 vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Motorola Defy 2 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads — 31/100 vs 27/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Defy 2 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is noticeably lighter (200g vs 268g).
Motorola Defy 2
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Better camera (28/100 vs 24/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 15W
- Lighter: 200g vs 268g
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Defy 2 vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Vivo Y300 (China) scores 4 points higher (31/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Defy 2 | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×80.0×11.9 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 268 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Defy 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Defy 2
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Defy 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (54/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Vivo Y300 (China) edges out the Motorola Defy 2 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Defy 2 and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Defy 2 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Defy 2 over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Motorola Defy 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.