Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G64 leads — 32/100 vs 26/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.9mm).
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (31/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Motorola Moto G64 scores 6 points higher (32/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100. In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | $130 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Moto G64 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.