Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy A26

The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads — 50/100 vs 49/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is faster in AnTuTu (754,064 vs 668,462); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.9mm).

The Samsung Galaxy A26 edges out the Motorola Moto G64 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G64

Performance 49
Display 67
Camera 35
Battery 53
Portability 55
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy A26

Performance 52
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 63
Value for money 50

What makes Motorola Moto G64 better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 192g vs 200g

  • Better camera (35/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 754064 vs 668462
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1008 vs 969
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2710 vs 2321

  • Higher performance (52/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (63/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Samsung Galaxy A26 scores 1 points higher (50/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G64 Samsung Galaxy A26
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Exynos 1380
AnTuTu 668462 754064
Geekbench Single 969 1008
Geekbench Multi 2321 2710
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) — 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP67
Dimensions 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm
Weight 192 g 200 g
Launch price — $250

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G64

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G64

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
67
display

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G64

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G64 and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G64 MediaTek Dimensity 7025
49/100
668462 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A26 Exynos 1380
50/100 +11.4%
754064 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A26 leads Motorola Moto G64 by 11.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G64

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy A26

$250

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Samsung Galaxy A26 edges out the Motorola Moto G64 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100.

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy A26?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Samsung Galaxy A26 (79/100 vs 67/100).