Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy A26
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380. Both devices score the same overall rating of 32/100. Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.9mm).
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
The Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 received the same MobileRank rating — 32/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy A26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 749719 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2758 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | $182 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A26
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A26?
Both devices scored 32/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy A26.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 32/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy A26?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.