Motorola Moto G35 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Moto G35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $187 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 33/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 628,581); the Motorola Moto G35 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 214g).
Motorola Moto G35
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Lighter: 188g vs 214g
- Cheaper: $187 vs $1299
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2186
- Faster charging: 60W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G35 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 42 points higher (75/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 leads (97/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (65/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (97/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G35 | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 10686 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.3×76.0×7.8 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $187 | $1299 |
Motorola Moto G35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Moto G35
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Motorola Moto G35 and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G35 by 82.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1112. Motorola Moto G35 is cheaper by $1112.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (84/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (86/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (65/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (97/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 by 42 points (75/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G35 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Moto G35 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G35 over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.