Motorola Moto G35 vs Samsung Galaxy A03
Comparing the Motorola Moto G35 (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G35 leads — 33/100 vs 16/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Moto G35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Motorola Moto G35 is thinner (7.8mm vs 9.1mm).
Motorola Moto G35
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 196g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 23/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 55/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparing the Motorola Moto G35 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the Motorola Moto G35 scores 17 points higher (33/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (31/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G35 | Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.5" PLS TFT | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.3×76.0×7.8 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $187 | — |
Motorola Moto G35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Moto G35
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Moto G35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (31/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G35 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G35 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G35 and the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G35 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G35 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 23/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G35 over the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.