Motorola Moto G17 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Moto G17 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $198 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 40/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 358,383).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 by 47 points (87/100 vs 40/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G17
Performance 30
Display 56
Camera 39
Battery 48
Portability 54
Value for money 44
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Moto G17 better?
  • Cheaper: $198 vs $834

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1416
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G17 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 47 points higher (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G17 is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (86/100 vs 44/100).

Motorola Moto G17: The Motorola Moto G17 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G17 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 358383 3269794
Geekbench Single 432 3228
Geekbench Multi 1416 9553
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 165.7×76.0×8.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 226 g
Price $198 $834
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G17
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 32MP
39
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G17
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
56
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G17
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G17 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G17 MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme
40/100
358383 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +89.0%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Moto G17 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G17
$198
Vivo X300 Pro
$834

Price difference: $636. Motorola Moto G17 is cheaper by $636.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (93/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (84/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (96/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (81/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G17 is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 (86/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G17 by 47 points (87/100 vs 40/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G17 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G17 has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G17 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.