Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 34/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 348,562); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) doesn't; the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) by 54 points (88/100 vs 34/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023)

Performance 29
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 49
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) better?

  • Lighter: 195g vs 226g

  • Better portability (49/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 348562
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 419
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1461
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 54 points higher (88/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 348562 3326259
Geekbench Single 419 3293
Geekbench Multi 1461 10243
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 162.9×74.1×9.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 195 g 226 g
Launch price — $899

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023)

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) MediaTek Helio G85
34/100
348562 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +89.5%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) by 89.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023)

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (94/100 vs 29/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (84/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) (81/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) by 54 points (88/100 vs 34/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 4G (2023) over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.