Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vivo Y32t
The Motorola Moto G Fast (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 25/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Moto G Fast is faster in AnTuTu (329,457 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Fast
Vivo Y32t
What makes Motorola Moto G Fast better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 329457 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1128 vs 779
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (24/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (15/100 vs 10/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 321
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 189g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 22/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G Fast vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (28/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast is a bit better (15/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G Fast | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×75.7×9.1 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
- Main: 16MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G Fast and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Moto G Fast leads Vivo Y32t by 8.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast is a bit better (15/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (52/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Motorola Moto G Fast by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Vivo Y32t?
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Vivo Y32t?
The Motorola Moto G Fast leads on camera score (15/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Fast over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 22/100).