Motorola Moto G Fast vs OPPO Reno16 Pro
The Motorola Moto G Fast (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 25/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 329,457); the OPPO Reno16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G Fast doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Fast
OPPO Reno16 Pro
What makes Motorola Moto G Fast better?
- Overall rating 25/100
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 1128
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 189g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 15/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G Fast vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 58 points higher (83/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (82/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (94/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (66/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G Fast | OPPO Reno16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 6405 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1560 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×75.7×9.1 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | $600 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
- Main: 16MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Fast
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G Fast and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Motorola Moto G Fast by 89.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G Fast
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (82/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (95/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (94/100 vs 15/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (66/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast by 58 points (83/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Fast and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G Fast has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 15/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Fast over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.