Motorola Moto G 2026 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Moto G 2026 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $200 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 44/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 524,785); the Motorola Moto G 2026 is noticeably lighter (202g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G 2026
Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 37
Battery 50
Portability 52
Value for money 50
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Moto G 2026 better?
  • Lighter: 202g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $899

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G 2026 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (87/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G 2026 — 50/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Motorola Moto G 2026: The Motorola Moto G 2026 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G 2026 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 524785 3269794
Geekbench Single 771 3228
Geekbench Multi 1980 9553
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 167.2×76.4×8.5 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 202 g 226 g
Launch price $200 $899
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G 2026
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G 2026
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G 2026 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G 2026 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
44/100
524785 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +84.0%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Moto G 2026 by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G 2026
$200
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $699. Motorola Moto G 2026 was $699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (93/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (84/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 (81/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G 2026 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G 2026 by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G 2026 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G 2026 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G 2026 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G 2026 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.