Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $300 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 58/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 990,586); the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion is noticeably lighter (178g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

Performance 59
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 59
Portability 80
Value for money 54

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Edge 70 Fusion better?

  • Lighter: 178g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $899

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 990586
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3168
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 30 points higher (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 59/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion — 54/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (81/100 vs 59/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 990586 3326259
Geekbench Single 1223 3293
Geekbench Multi 3168 10243
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5200 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×75.6×7.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 178 g 226 g
Launch price $300 $899

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
59
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 70 Fusion and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
58/100
990586 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +70.2%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Edge 70 Fusion by 70.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

$300

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $599. Motorola Edge 70 Fusion was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (94/100 vs 59/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (81/100 vs 59/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 70 Fusion has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 59/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.