Motorola Edge 60 Fusion vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $299 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 57/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 862,996); the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is noticeably lighter (178g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion by 31 points (88/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Performance 55
Display 83
Camera 42
Battery 58
Portability 69
Value for money 52

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Fusion better?

  • Lighter: 178g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $899

  • Better portability (69/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 862996
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (88/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 60 Fusion — 52/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Dimensity 7300 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 862996 3326259
Geekbench Single 1011 3293
Geekbench Multi 2813 10243
Display 6.7" LTPO pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1220x2712 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 161.0×73.0×8.3 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 178 g 226 g
Launch price $299 $899

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

  • 6.7" LTPO pOLED
  • Resolution: 1220x2712
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Dimensity 7300
57/100
862996 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +74.1%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Edge 60 Fusion by 74.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

$299

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $600. Motorola Edge 60 Fusion was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (94/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (81/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion by 31 points (88/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.