Motorola Edge 60 Fusion vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300, while the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
What makes Motorola Edge 60 Fusion better?
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Lighter: 178g vs 179g
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 53/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (44/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion are nearly equal (44/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 69/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 1001 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 2918 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×73.0×8.3 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $299 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- 6.7" LTPO pOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and Tecno Camon 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion are nearly equal (44/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 69/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro edges out the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Motorola Edge 60 Fusion has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 58/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (79/100 vs 69/100).