Meizu Note 16 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 44/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Meizu Note 16 better?
- Lighter: 217g vs 230g
- Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2200
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 47 points higher (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Meizu Note 16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Note 16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (99/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (85/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Meizu Note 16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.