Meizu Lucky 08 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Meizu Lucky 08 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Lucky 08 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 798,429); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Meizu Lucky 08 doesn't; the Meizu Lucky 08 is noticeably lighter (202g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Lucky 08
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Meizu Lucky 08 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 202g vs 309g
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 798429
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1015
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2687
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Lucky 08 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Lucky 08 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 798429 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1015 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2687 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.5×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Lucky 08 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Meizu Lucky 08 by 72.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Lucky 08
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (90/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Meizu Lucky 08 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Meizu Lucky 08 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Meizu Lucky 08 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Lucky 08 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.