Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 58/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Note 16 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,041,899); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 309g
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1041899
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3390
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 11 points higher (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1041899 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 64.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (90/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (52/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Meizu Note 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.