Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs Nokia XR30
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 leads — 50/100 vs 46/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 592,015).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Duo 3
Nokia XR30
What makes Lava Blaze Duo 3 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs the Nokia XR30, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 scores 4 points higher (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Duo 3 | Nokia XR30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2101 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 181 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Duo 3 and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Duo 3 leads Nokia XR30 by 17.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 or the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 or the Nokia XR30?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 or the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 leads on performance (51/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Duo 3 over the Nokia XR30?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Nokia XR30 (43/100 vs 30/100).