Lava Blaze Curve vs Nokia XR30
The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Curve leads — 54/100 vs 46/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Curve has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the Lava Blaze Curve is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 592,015); the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Curve
Nokia XR30
What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher performance (53/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Overall rating 46/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Nokia XR30, the Lava Blaze Curve scores 8 points higher (54/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Curve | Nokia XR30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 2101 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 189 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Curve
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Curve leads Nokia XR30 by 36.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Curve leads on camera score (48/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Nokia XR30?
The Lava Blaze Curve leads on performance (53/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Nokia XR30?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Lava Blaze Curve (79/100 vs 66/100).