Lava Blaze Dragon vs Poco C85 4G

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Dragon leads — 42/100 vs 38/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Lava Blaze Dragon is faster in AnTuTu (568,395 vs 358,608); the Poco C85 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Poco C85 4G is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).

The Lava Blaze Dragon edges out the Poco C85 4G by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

Poco C85 4G

Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 53
Portability 56
Value for money —

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 568395 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2115 vs 1416

  • Higher performance (46/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (56/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Poco C85 4G better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 210g

  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (56/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Poco C85 4G, the Lava Blaze Dragon scores 4 points higher (42/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon leads (46/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (46/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (56/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (56/100 vs 41/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon Poco C85 4G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
AnTuTu 568395 358608
Geekbench Single 915 432
Geekbench Multi 2115 1416
Display 6.8" LCD 6.9" IPS LCD
Resolution 900x1600 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 18W 33W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15, HyperOS 2
Brightness (peak) 450 nits 810 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP64
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm
Weight 210 g 205 g
Launch price $109 —

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Poco C85 4G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

Poco C85 4G

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Poco C85 4G

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Poco C85 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
Poco C85 4G MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
38/100 -58.5%
358608 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Dragon leads Poco C85 4G by 58.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

Poco C85 4G

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (46/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (56/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (56/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Poco C85 4G?

The Lava Blaze Dragon edges out the Poco C85 4G by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco C85 4G?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Poco C85 4G — 38/100.

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Poco C85 4G?

The Lava Blaze Dragon leads on performance (46/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Poco C85 4G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Lava Blaze Dragon (46/100 vs 30/100).