Lava Blaze Dragon vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $109 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 42/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 568,395); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Lava Blaze Dragon is noticeably lighter (210g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Dragon
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?
- Lighter: 210g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $1799
- Overall rating 42/100
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 568395
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2115
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 41 points higher (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Dragon | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" LCD | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 900x1600 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $109 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 6.8" LCD
- Resolution: 900x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 81.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1690. Lava Blaze Dragon was $1690 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (90/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (81/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (68/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 41 points (83/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.