Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $139 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 50/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 693,978); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $1799
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 33 points higher (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 77.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1660. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $1660 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (90/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 33 points (83/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.