Lava Play Ultra vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Lava Play Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $175 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 84/100 vs 53/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,952 vs 877,641); the Lava Play Ultra is noticeably lighter (182g vs 285g).
Lava Play Ultra
Motorola Razr Fold
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 182g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $175 vs $1799
- Better portability (71/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3068952 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2903 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Lava Play Ultra vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 31 points higher (84/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Play Ultra — 76/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 72/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Lava Play Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (91/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (71/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (71/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Lava Play Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9602 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.4×7.8 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $175 | $1799 |
Lava Play Ultra
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Lava Play Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Play Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Lava Play Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Lava Play Ultra by 71.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1624. Lava Play Ultra was $1624 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Lava Play Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (91/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (71/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (71/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Lava Play Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra by 31 points (84/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Play Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Lava Play Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Play Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Play Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Lava Play Ultra over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Lava Play Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.