Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $139 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 50/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 693,978); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $1499
- Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 28 points higher (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (64/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3379591 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1224x2992 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 79.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1360. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $1360 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (60/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (64/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 28 points (78/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.