Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo X300s
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $139 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 693,978); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo X300s
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $723
- Better portability (79/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (83/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (79/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 174 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 81.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $584. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $584 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (83/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (79/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo X300s?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo X300s?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.