Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $139 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 50/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 693,978); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $548
- Better portability (79/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 25 points higher (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 80.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $409. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $409 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 25 points (75/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.