Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $139 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 50/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,758,268 vs 693,978); the Vivo iQOO 15 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 36 points (86/100 vs 50/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Lighter: 174g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $599

  • Better portability (79/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3758268 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1037
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2386
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 36 points higher (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (79/100 vs 48/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 693978 3758268
Geekbench Single 1037 3013
Geekbench Multi 2386 9287
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 33W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 6000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 174 g 215 g
Launch price $139 $599

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +81.5%
3758268 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 81.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $460. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $460 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (78/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (85/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (79/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 36 points (86/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.