Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo X500
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $139 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 693,978); the Vivo X500 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 211g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo X500
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 211g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $820
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo X500 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo X500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3930719 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3302 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 10240 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 211 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $820 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X500
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 82.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $681. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $681 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (96/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (84/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo X500?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500?
The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo X500?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.