Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $139 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 50/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 693,978); the Vivo X500 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 192g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 192g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $970
- Better portability (79/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 40 points higher (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (100/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (79/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $970 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 86.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $831. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $831 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (100/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (81/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (79/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 40 points (90/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.