Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs OPPO Reno16 Pro
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $139 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 50/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 693,978); the OPPO Reno16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
OPPO Reno16 Pro
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 188g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $600
- Better portability (79/100 vs 64/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 33 points higher (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (82/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (66/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (79/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | OPPO Reno16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 6405 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $600 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 77.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $461. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $461 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (82/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (66/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (79/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 33 points (83/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.