Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Motorola Razr 50
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 50 leads — 51/100 vs 50/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the Motorola Razr 50 is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 693,978); the Motorola Razr 50 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Motorola Razr 50
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 1011
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 30W
- Lighter: 174g vs 188g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 36/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 74/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 50 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2813 vs 2386
- Higher performance (55/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (36/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Motorola Razr 50, the Motorola Razr 50 scores 1 points higher (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Motorola Razr 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 92 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Motorola Razr 50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 50 leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 is a bit better (36/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (46/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr 50?
The Motorola Razr 50 edges out the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Motorola Razr 50?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Motorola Razr 50 — 51/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Motorola Razr 50?
The Motorola Razr 50 leads on camera score (36/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Motorola Razr 50?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.