Lava Agni 3 vs Motorola Razr 50
The Lava Agni 3 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Agni 3 leads — 54/100 vs 51/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Agni 3 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the Motorola Razr 50 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Agni 3
Motorola Razr 50
What makes Lava Agni 3 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 30W
- Better camera (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 50 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 212g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Agni 3 vs the Motorola Razr 50, the Lava Agni 3 scores 3 points higher (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 leads (53/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Lava Agni 3 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Agni 3 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (53/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Lava Agni 3 (74/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Agni 3 | Motorola Razr 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2652 | 1080x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 30W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 92 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.5×8.8 mm | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Agni 3
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Agni 3
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2652
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Agni 3
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Agni 3 and Motorola Razr 50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Agni 3 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Agni 3 and the Motorola Razr 50 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Agni 3 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (53/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Lava Agni 3 (74/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Agni 3 or the Motorola Razr 50?
The Lava Agni 3 edges out the Motorola Razr 50 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Agni 3 and the Motorola Razr 50?
The Lava Agni 3 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Motorola Razr 50 — 51/100.
Should you choose the Lava Agni 3 over the Motorola Razr 50?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Motorola Razr 50 (74/100 vs 44/100).