Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 28/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) doesn't; the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 828
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 41 points higher (69/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (91/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (52/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (63/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×9.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Main: 16MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by 93.2% in our overall performance rating.
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (91/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (52/100 vs 19/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (63/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by 41 points (69/100 vs 28/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 19/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.