Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $199 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 51/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 582,651); the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (155g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 155g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $2899
- Better display (93/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 582651
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 724
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1927
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5160 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 18 points higher (69/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 582651 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 724 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1927 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / XOS 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.8×6.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 155 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ by 80.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2700. Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ was $2700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ (90/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (93/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ (52/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.