Infinix Hot 40 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Hot 40 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 48/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 563,880); the Infinix Hot 40 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 563880
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 21 points higher (69/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 40 Pro (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 40 Pro (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Infinix Hot 40 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 563880 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13.5 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.6×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix Hot 40 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Hot 40 Pro by 80.7% in our overall performance rating.
Infinix Hot 40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 40 Pro (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 40 Pro (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 40 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 40 Pro by 21 points (69/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 40 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 40 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 40 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 40 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 40 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.