Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco C65
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; launch prices were $349 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 33/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,959,760 vs 348,562).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Poco C65
What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1959760 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $349
- Better portability (63/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Poco C65, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 32 points higher (65/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (76/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Poco C65 — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (76/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Infinix GT 50 Pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 1959760 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | $99 |
Camera comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 50 Pro leads Poco C65 by 462.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $250. Poco C65 was $250 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (76/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (69/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Infinix GT 50 Pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C65?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 32 points (65/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C65?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C65?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on performance (76/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Poco C65?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.