Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $350 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 68/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,578,152); the Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (210g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Performance 69
Display 100
Camera 46
Battery 77
Portability 53
Value for money 76
Vivo X200 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 84
What makes Infinix GT 30 Pro better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 210g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $889

  • Better display (100/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (53/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1578152
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4313
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 18 points higher (86/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Infinix GT 30 Pro — 76/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (93/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (53/100 vs 34/100).

Infinix GT 30 Pro: The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Infinix GT 30 Pro Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1578152 3092340
Geekbench Single 1398 3100
Geekbench Multi 4313 10095
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 167
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 210 g 229 g
Launch price $350 $889
Camera comparison
Infinix GT 30 Pro
  • Main: 108MP
  • Front: 32MP
46
camera
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Infinix GT 30 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Infinix GT 30 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wireless: 30W
77
battery
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
68/100
1578152 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +49.0%
3092340 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads Infinix GT 30 Pro by 49.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Infinix GT 30 Pro
$350
Vivo X200 Ultra
$889

Launch price difference: $539. Infinix GT 30 Pro was $539 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (93/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (78/100 vs 77/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (53/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.