Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $350 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 69/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,578,152); the Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 210g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $350 vs $950
- Better display (100/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1578152
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 77/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 22 points higher (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (94/100 vs 78/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 30 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1578152 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $350 | $950 |
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Infinix GT 30 Pro by 62.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $600. Infinix GT 30 Pro is cheaper by $600.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (99/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (94/100 vs 78/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro by 22 points (91/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.