Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $349 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,137,843); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 229g).
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 200g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $889
- Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2137843
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6100
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 69/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 72/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2137843 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | $889 |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 30.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $540. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $540 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.