Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (2024) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9010, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1200 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 75/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,155,792); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 163).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

Performance 65
Display 85
Camera 90
Battery 80
Portability 39
Value for money 60

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Huawei Pura 70 Ultra better?

  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 226g vs 230g

  • Overall rating 75/100

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1155792
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1400
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4500
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1200

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 90/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9010 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1155792 4247433
Geekbench Single 1400 3639
Geekbench Multi 4500 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2844x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 80W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 163 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 4.2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.6×75.1×8.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 226 g 230 g
Launch price $1200 $950

Camera comparison

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
90
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2844x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010
75/100
1155792 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +72.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Huawei Pura 70 Ultra by 72.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

$1200

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $250. Vivo X300 Ultra was $250 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (99/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 90/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 90/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.