Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (2025) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9030, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1050 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 54/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,101,808).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max by 33 points (87/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
Performance 34
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 80
Design 1
Value for money 37
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 100
Camera 96
Battery 77
Design 12
Value for money 44
What makes Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W

  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 77/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2101808
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1680
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6200
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 230g vs 239g
  • Cheaper: $950 vs $1050

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 34/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (12/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better value for money (44/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 1/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100).

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max: The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max is a better fit for those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2101808 4247433
Geekbench Single 1680 3640
Geekbench Multi 6200 11033
Display 6.9" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1320x2848 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 80W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 6.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 164.4×79.0×8.3 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 239 g 230 g
Price $1050 $950
Camera comparison
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
63
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 1320x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max HiSilicon Kirin 9030
54/100
2101808 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +50.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max by 50.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max
$1050
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $100.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (96/100 vs 34/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (96/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (12/100 vs 1/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max by 33 points (87/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 34/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.