Huawei Mate 60 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Huawei Mate 60 (2023) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9000S, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4750); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,497,741); the Huawei Mate 60 is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Huawei Mate 60
Performance 67
Display 83
Camera 41
Battery 63
Portability 54
Value for money 34
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Huawei Mate 60 better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 209g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $950

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1497741
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1325
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4118
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4750 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 41/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 60 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Huawei Mate 60 — 34/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 60 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Huawei Mate 60: The Huawei Mate 60 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Huawei Mate 60 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000S Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1497741 4247433
Geekbench Single 1325 3640
Geekbench Multi 4118 11033
Display 6.7" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1216x2688 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4750 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 66W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 4.0 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 161.4×76.0×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 209 g 230 g
Launch price $899 $950
Camera comparison
Huawei Mate 60
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 13MP
41
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Huawei Mate 60
  • 6.7" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2688
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Huawei Mate 60
  • 4750 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
63
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 60 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 60 HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
61/100
1497741 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +64.7%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Huawei Mate 60 by 64.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Huawei Mate 60
$899
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $51. Huawei Mate 60 was $51 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (99/100 vs 67/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (96/100 vs 41/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 (85/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 60 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Huawei Mate 60 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 60 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 60 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 60 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 41/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 60 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 60 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 60 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.