Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Huawei Mate 60 Pro (2024) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9000S, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1100 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,328,024).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Mate 60 Pro

Performance 64
Display 83
Camera 66
Battery 72
Portability 42
Value for money 44

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Huawei Mate 60 Pro better?

  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 225g vs 230g

  • Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1328024
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1150
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3800
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 88W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1100

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 66/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 72/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 72/100). Value score: Huawei Mate 60 Pro — 44/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Huawei Mate 60 Pro: The Huawei Mate 60 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Mate 60 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9000S Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1328024 4247433
Geekbench Single 1150 3639
Geekbench Multi 3800 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2720x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 88W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS HarmonyOS 4.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 163.7×79.0×8.1 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 225 g 230 g
Launch price $1100 $950

Camera comparison

Huawei Mate 60 Pro

  • Main: 48MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 13MP
66
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Mate 60 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2720x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Mate 60 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 88W
  • Wireless: 50W
72
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate 60 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate 60 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
67/100
1328024 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +68.7%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Huawei Mate 60 Pro by 68.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Mate 60 Pro

$1100

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $150. Vivo X300 Ultra was $150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro (99/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro (96/100 vs 66/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 72/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Mate 60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 60 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate 60 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate 60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 66/100).

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Mate 60 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate 60 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Huawei Mate 60 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.