Honor X9 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor X9 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 42/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 424,216); the Honor X9 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X9
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor X9 better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 189g vs 309g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 424216
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 412
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1423
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 31/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X9 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 27 points higher (69/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X9 (90/100 vs 31/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X9 (70/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X9 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 424216 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 412 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1423 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor X9
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor X9
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X9
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X9 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor X9 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor X9
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X9 (90/100 vs 31/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X9 (70/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X9 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X9 by 27 points (69/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X9 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X9 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X9 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Honor X9 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.