Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade A72 4G (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 17/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A72 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A72 4G doesn't; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade A72 4G, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 13 points higher (30/100 vs 17/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (51/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade A72 4G — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade A72 4G — 17/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A72 4G is a better fit for everyday use.