Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y75 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y75 4G (2022) on specs and benchmarks. Both devices score the same overall rating of 30/100. Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4050); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y75 4G doesn't; the Vivo Y75 4G is noticeably lighter (172g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y75 4G
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4050 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 13/100)
- Lighter: 172g vs 199g
- Better camera (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 51/100)
The Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y75 4G received the same MobileRank rating — 30/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y75 4G leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y75 4G is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo Y75 4G (43/100 vs 13/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y75 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G96 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 493222 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 678 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1895 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4050 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 550 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 160.9×74.3×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 172 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y75 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y75 4G
- 6.4" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y75 4G
- 4050 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y75 4G is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo Y75 4G (43/100 vs 13/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y75 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y75 4G?
Both devices scored 30/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y75 4G.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y75 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y75 4G — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y75 4G?
The Vivo Y75 4G leads on camera score (41/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y75 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y75 4G is a better fit for everyday use.