Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads — 43/100 vs 30/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4800 mAh
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro scores 13 points higher (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads (71/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (71/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 902765 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 138 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (71/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor X40 GT Racing — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro leads on camera score (71/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.