Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo T5x
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo T5x (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T5x leads — 34/100 vs 30/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T5x has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T5x doesn't; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 219g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo T5x
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 219g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4800 mAh
- Higher performance (4/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo T5x, the Vivo T5x scores 4 points higher (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5x leads (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T5x and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo T5x is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5x is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo T5x (51/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo T5x | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo | |
| AnTuTu | — | 956756 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2344 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 219 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo T5x
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo T5x
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T5x
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo T5x and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo T5x is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5x is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo T5x (51/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T5x?
The Vivo T5x edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T5x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo T5x — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T5x?
The Vivo T5x leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo T5x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T5x is a better fit for everyday use.